Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
[1]������� Nothing must be reported in this case which would serve to identify the child who is the subject of these proceedings or any of the parties.
(b)������ On 17 April 2002, Constable McC, from Mountpottinger Police, informed the Social Services that on 17 April 2002 R had alleged that P had assaulted her by hurting her arm, cutting her ear and bruising her face.� She was brought to the hospital but she did not request any further police involvement stating that her relationship with P was over.
(d)������ On 2 July 2002, P attacked her on the Woodstock Road and trailed her into his home.� She stated this time he threw a knife at her and eventually she managed to escape him.�
[10]����� Before making a Care Order I am obliged to consider arrangements for contact and to invite the parties to comment.� I have done that on this instance and I have concluded that the proposals by the Trust for contact are appropriate.� I shall return to these later in my judgment.�
[11]����� I now turn to consider the statutory provisions governing the application by the Trust to free this child for adoption as in the Adoption Order (Northern Ireland) 1987 (hereinafter called "the 1987 Order").� Article�9 sets out the duty to promote the welfare of the child as follows:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.