Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
On 16 July 2010 the Complaint was received by Nominet. On 19 July 2010 Nominet validated the Complaint.
On 10 August 2010, because no Response had been received, a notification of no response was sent to the Parties by Nominet.
The Complainant is the owner of the trademarks LEGO (registered all over the world in respect of various goods and services) and LEGOLAND (registered for classes 9, 16 and 25 in the United Kingdom since 1989), used in connection with LEGO brand toys and products, as well as the Legoland Park located in Windsor and opened in 1996. The Complainant has developed substantial goodwill through use of the LEGO trade mark in many jurisdictions across the world.
The Complainant is also the owner of more than 1000 domain names containing the terms LEGO and LEGOLAND, including <lego.com>, <lego.co.uk>, <legoland.com>, and <legoland.co.uk>.
There is no information available about the Respondent except for that provided in the Complaint and in the registration details on the Whois.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.