Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� St�phanie Mourou-Vikstr�m, President, ��������� Ganna Yudkivska, ��������� Lado Chanturia, judges, and Martina Keller, Deputy Section Registrar,
the application (no. 9021/11 ) against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Ukrainian national, Mr Valentyn Ivanovych Ivanov (�the applicant�), on 21 January 2011;
the decision to give notice to the Ukrainian Government (�the Government�) of the complaint under Article 6 � 1 of the Convention concerning the fairness of proceedings, and to declare the remainder of the application inadmissible;
The present case concerns a failure of the national courts to address a specific and pertinent argument which was important to the outcome of the applicant�s case concerning the allocation of the �children of war� supplement to his pension. The applicant invoked Article 6 � 1 of the Convention.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.