Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 8 • Expulsion • Family life • Revocation of residence permit of long-term settled migrant of Moroccan nationality and a ten-year entry ban due to repeated convictions for serious drug-related offences • Risk of reoffending • Lack of proper substantiation of interaction with his minor children who lived with their mother • Limited yet sufficient ties with Morocco to build a new life there • No obstacles to maintaining contact with his children • Limited duration of ban • Proportionality duly assessed by domestic courts in light of Court�s case-law • Margin of appreciation not overstepped
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Pere Pastor Vilanova , President , ��������� Georgios A. Serghides, ��������� Jolien Schukking, ��������� Darian Pavli, ��������� Peeter Roosma, ��������� Ioannis Ktistakis, ��������� Andreas Z�nd , judges , and Milan Bla�ko, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 57766/19) against the Kingdom of the Netherlands lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Moroccan national, Mr Farid Loukili (�the applicant�), on 30 October 2019;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.