Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             Permission to appeal the First-tier Tribunal's decision having been granted by a judge of the Upper Tribunal the matter came before Upper Tribunal Judge Kopieczek who found that the Judge Moon had materially erred in law in both appeals and set aside the decisions allowing the appeals in a decision dated 22 nd December 2023. Directions were then given for the remaking of the appeal in the Upper Tribunal.
             On 29 th May 2024 the respondent notified the Upper Tribunal that the appellant had been removed to Romania on 14 th May 2024, and suggested that the appeal should therefore be treated as abandoned.
             The appellant has not contacted the Upper Tribunal to confirm that he wishes to pursue his appeal. I therefore remake the appeal by dismissing it on all grounds.
      The making of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved the making of an error on a point of law.
      Upper Tribunal Judge Kopieczek set aside the decisions of the First-tier Tribunal allowing the appeal under the EUSS, under the EEA Regulations.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.