Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
1.���� This is a claimant�s application for leave to appeal from the decision of an appeal tribunal with reference EK/3719/20/02/D.
2.���� For the reasons I give below, I grant leave to appeal. �However, I disallow the appeal.
3.���� The appellant claimed personal independence payment (PIP) from the Department for Communities (the Department) from 11 February 2020 on the basis of needs arising from epilepsy, asthma, social anxiety, sciatica and vitamin B12 deficiency.
6.���� The appellant, represented by Ms Williams of Community Advice Fermanagh, submits that the tribunal has erred in law by not fully considering:
7.���� The Department was invited to make observations on the appellant�s grounds. �Ms Patterson of Decision Making Services (DMS) responded on behalf of the Department. �Ms Patterson submitted that the tribunal had not materially erred in law. �She indicated that the Department did not support the application.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.