Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
        This is an application by Ishaq (the Applicant ) for reconsideration of a decision dated 20 March 2024 of a panel of the Parole Board (the Panel ) following an oral hearing held remotely by video on 12 March 2024. The Panel decided not to direct the Applicant�s release and not to make a recommendation for his transfer to open conditions.
        Rule 28(1) of the Parole Board Rules 2019, as amended by the Parole Board (Amendment) Rules 2022, (the Parole Board Rules ) provides that applications for reconsideration may be made in eligible cases (as set out in Rule 28(2)) either on the basis (a) that the decision contains an error of law, (b) that it is irrational and/or (c) that it is procedurally unfair.
        I have considered the application on the following papers:
�              an application for reconsideration dated 2 April 2024 (the Application ) submitted by the Applicant�s solicitors;
�              the Panel�s decision dated 20 March 2024; and
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.