Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
����������������������������������������������������������������������� [2018 No. 56M]
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT of Mr. Justice Jordan delivered on the 16 th day of April 2021
                  The Court has heard the submissions on behalf of both parties and it has considered the authorities submitted by both parties.
                  The other point to make in relation to the documentation which is sought is that the s.47 report or reports came into being as a result of a s.47 Order which the Court made for a very specific purpose.� In the ordinary course of events these s.47 reports contain a factual narrative obtained by Dr. A.B. and then her conclusion and recommendations as a result of the information she has received.
                  In the first instance, it is useful to set out the relevant provision (section 47) of the Family Law Act 1995: -
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.