Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
              The Entry Clearance Officer ("ECO") appeals, with permission, against the determination of the First-tier Tribunal(Judge Farrelly) promulgated on 22 March 2023. By its decision, the Tribunal allowed both appellants' appeal against the ECO's decisions dated 4 October 2021 and 29 July 2021 to refuse their applications made for family permits under the EU Settlement Scheme.
              Although the appellant in these proceedings is the ECO, for convenience I will refer to the ECO as the respondent and to the appellants before the FtT as "the appellants," thus reflecting their positions before the First-tier Tribunal.
              The First-tier Tribunal did not make an anonymity order and no grounds have been advanced on behalf of the appellants to make such an order.
              The respondent sought permission to appeal on two grounds and permission was granted by a Judge of the First-tier Tribunal on 26 April 2023.
              At the hearing before the Upper Tribunal, Mr Diwnycz appeared on behalf of the ECO and Mr Simo on behalf of the appellants. Mr Diwnycz stated that he relied on the written grounds of challenge and did not seek to expand on the grounds in any oral submissions.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.