Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
            I agreed further evidence could be served, if appropriate. A consolidated bundle containing further evidence, including witness statements form the Sponsor and two Appellants, was served.
            The Sponsor, Maya Paija Pun, gave oral evidence through the interpreter and was cross-examined by Mr Tufan. She adopted her two statements and confirmed the following:
            Mr Jaisri relied on his skeleton argument at page 79 of the composite bundle. He submitted the Tribunal needed to ask itself two questions:
            Mr Jaisri accepted it was difficult to show emotional security but he argued that access to funds and the family home plus the Sponsor's visits to Nepal demonstrated emotional and financial ties, which whilst less than when she came to this country, were sufficient for the purposes of their claim. The proportionality assessment, if accepted, fell in their favour.
            Having heard submissions I reserved my decision which I now give.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.