Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mark Twomey KC and William Dean (instructed by Hugh James) for the Applicant The First and Second Respondents in person Jo Delahunty KC and Fiona Holloran (instructed by Lord, Cox and Salt Solicitors) for the Third and Fourth Respondents Sam King KC and Callum Brook (instructed by Hogans Solicitors) for the Intervenor Judgment date: 7 March 2025 ____________________
(2) The email dated 13 February 2025 sets out X and Y's ' significant concerns with regards to the links between Ms Summers and others with Ms Delahunty' as set out in their email (which is taken as referring to the email dated 6 February 2025) as from the tweets attached to that email 'there are very clear links and expressed friendships between Ms Summers, Ms Tickle, Mr Barnes and Ms Delahunty. We believe these links demonstrate bias and unfairness to this process' such as to bring matters within rule 27.11(3)(b).
(3) That X and Y do not know how Ms Summers became aware of these proceedings and attended the hearing on 31 January 2025.
(4) The adjournment of the proceedings from 16 December 2024 to 31 January 2025 during which time the new transparency rules came into force nationally on 27 January 2025.
Please can this email be forwarded to Her Ladyship. We have copied the other parties into this email .
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.