Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Pauliine Koskelo , President , ��������� Lorraine Schembri Orland, ��������� Davor Derenčinović , judges , and Dorothee von Arnim, Deputy Section Registrar,
the application (no. 28377/11) against the Republic of T�rkiye lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) on 28 April 2011 by a Turkish national, Mr Ali Karatay (�the applicant�), who was born in 1971 and detained in İzmir, and was represented before the Court by Mr S. Cengiz, a lawyer practising in İzmir;
the decision to give notice of the complaints under Articles 6, 8 and 11 of the Convention and Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention to the Turkish Government (�the Government�), represented by their Agent, Mr Hacı Ali A�ıkg�l, Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of T�rkiye, and to declare the remainder of the application inadmissible;
the decision to reject the Government�s objection to examination of the application by a Committee;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.