Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             This is an appeal against the decision of FtT Judge Prudham, promulgated on 19 January 2023.
             Case law has moved on since then. Mr Ndubuisi founded on Rexhaj (dependent parents, assumed dependency) [2023] UKUT 161 , which is headnoted thus:
a. has been granted entry clearance as a dependent parent under Appendix EU (Family Permit); and b. is subsequently granted limited leave to enter at the border as a dependent parent, the operative basis upon which the individual was granted leave to enter at the border is to be found within Appendix EU.
It follows that such an applicant will already have been granted leave as a dependent parent under Appendix EU (c.f. "under this Appendix") and, pursuant to the definition of "dependent parent" in Annex 1 to Appendix EU at paragraph (c)(i), will not be subject to the requirement to establish dependency.
             Mr Diwyncz offered no argument against the application of that decision.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.