Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
       The Appellants appeal with permission a decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Mack ('the Judge'), promulgated following a hearing at Manchester on 16 February 2023, in which the Judge dismissed their appeals.
       The Appellants are nationals of Pakistan who applied for EEA family permits on 5 November 2020 as the dependence of Mubashar Ali ('the Sponsor') who is the brother of the first appellant.
       Having considered the evidence the Judge sets out her findings of fact from [43] of the decision under challenge.
       The Judge notes no issue was taken by the Entry Clearance Officer (ECO) with the biological relationship between the Appellants and Sponsor.
       The Judge noted the gap in the evidence in relation to remittances, finding at [62] not being satisfied that the Appellants had addressed what is described as "the huge gap in the remittances" and was satisfied this was because they are unable to do so, which the Judge finds undermines the claim that the Appellants are dependent upon the Sponsor for their essential needs.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.