Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(a) The quashing of the decision by the Secretary of State for the Home Department ("the respondent") to remove her to the Republic of Ireland.
(b) An order of mandamus requiring the respondent to accept the applicant back into the UK from the Republic of Ireland and accept responsibility for her asylum claim.
(c) An order to quash the decision of the respondent to certify the human rights claim of the applicant as "clearly unfounded" and to declare that the decision was unlawful, ultra vires, contrary to her Article 5 and 8 rights under the European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("ECHR") and of no force or effect.
(d) A declaration that her removal offended against her legitimate expectation that she would be informed of any decision to transfer her to the Republic of Ireland and be given an opportunity to make representations before any such application was made or a decision to transfer effected.
(e) A declaration that her removal was contrary to the terms of the Dublin II Regulations.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.