Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Simon Thorley QC, Mr Adrian Speck and Mr Jonathan Hill (instructed by Eversheds LLP) for the Claimant Mr Richard Arnold QC and Mr Brian Nicholson (instructed by Herbert Smith) for the Defendants Hearing dates: 17-18, 21-25 April, 6-9 May 2008 ____________________
i) Is Zipher's attempt to amend in breach of any undertaking it has given to the court?
iii) Are Zipher's amendments to 602 allowable in the exercise of any discretion retained by the court?
iv) Are any claims in the four patents in suit invalid for lack of novelty over US Patent Specification No. 4 909 648 ("Datamax")?
v) Was the information in a Markem document called "the Adkin Memorandum" made available to the public before the priority date of 602?
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.