Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Civil service - EIB staff - Fixed-term contract - No conversion into contract of indefinite duration - Conversion of contracts - Criteria - Manifest error of assessment - Prior notice - Conflict of interest - Action for annulment and for damages)
European Investment Bank (EIB), represented by G. Faedo, A. García Sánchez and K. Carr, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer,
composed of R. da Silva Passos, President, N. Półtorak and T. Pynnä (Rapporteur), Judges,
having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court,
By his action based on Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant, RS, seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 20 December 2021 not to convert his employment contract into a contract of indefinite duration (‘the decision not to convert the contract’) and, second, compensation for the harm which he claims to have suffered as a result. He also seeks annulment of the letter of the EIB of 20 December 2021 confirming the decision not to convert the contract.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.