Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
( Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Microprocessors market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement - 'Naked' restrictions - Consequences of the annulment in part of an earlier decision - Nature of the infringement - Amount of the fine - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Proportionality - Whether appropriate - Unlimited jurisdiction )
Intel Corporation Inc., established in Wilmington, Delaware (United States), represented by B. Meyring, J.-F. Bellis, lawyers, D. Beard and J. Williams, Barristers-at-Law,
European Commission, represented by F. Castillo de la Torre and P. Caro de Sousa, acting as Agents,
composed, at the time of the deliberations, of A. Marcoulli, President, J. Schwarcz and W. Valasidis (Rapporteur), Judges,
By its action under Articles 261 and 263 TFEU, the applicant, Intel Corporation Inc., seeks, first, the annulment of Commission Decision C(2023) 5914 final of 22 September 2023 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (AT.37990 – Intel) ('the contested decision') and, second, the cancellation or reduction of the fine imposed on it in that decision.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.