Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment was delivered in private.� The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published.� Nevertheless, the anonymity of everyone identified in the judgment only by initials must be strictly preserved. They must be referred to by the allocated initials alone.� All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.
���Mr Edward Boydell (instructed by Family Law in Partnership) for the Respondent
(a)    The income, earning capacity, property and other financial resources which each of the parties to the marriage has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future, including in the case of earning capacity, any increase in that capacity which it would in the opinion of the court be reasonable to expect a party to the marriage to take steps to acquire;
(b)    The financial needs, obligations and responsibilities which each of the parties to the marriage has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future;
(c)    The standard of living enjoyed by the family before the breakdown of the marriage;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.