Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Unless and until a tribunal or court directs otherwise, the Appellants are granted anonymity. No report of these proceedings shall directly or indirectly identify any of the Appellants or any member of their family. This direction applies to, amongst others, both the Appellants and the Respondent. Failure to comply with this direction could lead to contempt of court proceedings.
             The Appellants are all nationals of Afghanistan. They are respectively a mother born in 1984 and her 6 children, who range in age from 3 to 21. They seek entry clearance to the United Kingdom because they want to come here to be reunited with S, the son of PS and the brother of the remaining Appellants. S has been recognised as a refugee.
             The relevant paragraph of the Immigration Rules to the applications of PS and her adult daughter was 319V. I have here omitted those parts of the rule that are not relevant and have highlighted the matters in issue:
319V. The requirements to be met by a person seeking leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as the parent, grandparent or other dependent relative of a person with limited leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as a refugee or beneficiary of humanitarian protection are that the person:
(i) is related to a refugee or beneficiary of humanitarian protection with limited leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom in one of the following ways:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.