Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
( Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Internal competition COM/AD6/2022 - Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition - Neutralisation of certain questions in the multiple-choice questionnaire test - Method of neutralisation - Lack of rounding )
European Commission, represented by K. Talabér-Ritz and L. Hohenecker, acting as Agents,
composed of R. da Silva Passos, President, T. Pynnä and H. Cassagnabère (Rapporteur), Judges,
having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court,
By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant, EL, seeks, first, annulment of the decision of 28 June 2023 by which the selection board for internal competition COM/AD 6/2022 ('the internal competition') informed her that she had not qualified for the next stage of that competition and, second, an order requiring the European Commission to readmit her to the internal competition.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.