Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 2 (procedural) • Ineffective investigation into allegedly negligent planning and conduct of an operation against a dangerous individual, who killed an officer while being arrested • Obligation to investigate into negligence or omissions on the officials� part arising also in relation to police officers killed by private persons while performing their duties
Art 2 (substantive) • Scope and content of the State�s positive obligation to take preventive operational measures to protect its own law-enforcement personnel against risks to their life • Authorities� precautions reasonable, despite some mistakes in the planning and conduct of the law-enforcement operation • Authorities afforded margin of appreciation and not to be subjected to an impossible or disproportionate burden in this context • Requirement to ensure proper training and preparation of officers taking part in dangerous operations
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Tim Eicke, President , ��������� Yonko Grozev, ��������� Faris Vehabović, ��������� Iulia Antoanella Motoc, ��������� Armen Harutyunyan, ��������� Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, ��������� Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges , and Andrea Tamietti, Section Registrar,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.