Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             For ease of reference, we will refer to the appellants before the First-tier Tribunal as "the appellants", or as the first and second appellant respectively. We will refer to the Secretary of State simply as "the Secretary of State".
             Shortly after the hearing before us, the decision in Chimi (deprivation appeals; scope and evidence) Cameroon [2023] UKUT 115 (IAC) was reported. We issued directions to the parties in the following terms:
"If either party wishes to make written submissions concerning the impact, if any, of Chimi (deprivation appeals; scope and evidence) Cameroon [2023] UKUT 115 (IAC) on its submissions in these proceedings, it must do so within seven days of being sent these directions."
             We are grateful to Mr Karim for his written submissions dated 31 May 2023 on behalf of the appellants. The Secretary of State did not respond.
             Following Chimi , there has been a further development. The Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Shyti v Secretary of State for the Home Department on 4 July 2023, which was an appeal under section 40A of the 1981 Act. The operative reasoning in Shyti concerned the failure of the First-tier Tribunal to address the entirety of the reasoning of the Secretary of State in the impugned decision. As such, we did not consider it necessary to seek further submissions on that matter.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.