Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
              No one attended the hearing on behalf of the appellants. The day before the hearing the appellants' representatives emailed a letter to the Upper Tribunal stating:
"Our instructions are that the Appellants do not wish to have legal representation in the hearing set for tomorrow. They request that their appeals kindly be decided based on their previous evidence and submissions already available to the Tribunal".
                   In the light of this letter I have decided to proceed.
              By a decision promulgated on 17 June 2023 I set aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Cohen), with no findings preserved. I now re-make that decision.
              The only issue for me to resolve, as was made clear in my decision promulgated on 17 June 2023, is whether the sponsor and appellants' son are married, as claimed.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.