Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             This is the remaking of the appeals of the appellants following the decision of Upper Tribunal Judge Blum to set aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal dismissing their appeals against the decisions of the respondent, dated 21 December 2019, to refuse to issue them with EEA Family Permits.
              No anonymity direction was made previously, and there is no reason for one now.
              The appellants are now aged in their late twenties and are the nephews of the sponsor, Mrs Rose Mansah, who is an Italian national residing in the United Kingdom. They applied to join their sponsor in the United Kingdom on 21 November 2019. According to the decision notices, the applications were refused solely on the basis that the appellants had not provided sufficient evidence that their relationship with the sponsor was as stated.
              While the judge accepted that the appellants and the sponsor were related as claimed, the appeal was dismissed on the basis that the appellants were not dependent upon the sponsor and that the sponsor was not exercising treaty rights in the United Kingdom.
              Upper Tribunal Judge Blum's decision of 27 June 2023 included the following directions:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.