Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Application for interim measures – Law governing the institutions – Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Appointment of the European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by Lithuania – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility)
APPLICATION under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of operation of Decision No 28/2021 of the College of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office of 21 April 2021 rejecting the applicant’s candidacy for the position of European Delegated Public Prosecutor,
The applicant, WO, holds the position of Prosecutor of the Republic of Lithuania.
On 23 December 2020, the Republic of Lithuania nominated four prosecutors, including the applicant, as candidates for the positions of European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), pursuant in particular to Article 86 TFEU and Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’) (OJ 2017 L 283, p. 1).
On 21 April 2021, the College of the EPPO adopted Decision No 28/2021, rejecting the applicant’s candidacy for the position of European Delegated Public Prosecutor (‘the contested decision’).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.