Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant and/or any member of his family is granted anonymity. No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant and/or his family. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             This is an appeal by the Secretary of State. However, I will refer to the parties as they were designated in the First-tier Tribunal.
             The appellant is a citizen of Romania. His wife and three children have leave to remain under the EU Settlement Scheme.
             On 19 July 2022 the respondent made a decision ("the SSHD Decision") to deport the appellant under the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2016, as saved ("the 2016 Regulations"). This was because in November 2021 the appellant was convicted of three counts of theft and sentenced to 2 years imprisonment and the respondent considered that his deportation was justified on serious grounds of public policy and public security.
             Prior to coming to the UK the appellant had been convicted and imprisoned in both France and Austria for crimes involving dishonesty.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.