Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
                  This matter has been remitted by the Court of Appeal for re-hearing of the appeal of C (hereafter referred to as 'the father') against the registration of a maintenance order made in Elbert County District Court, Colorado (hereafter 'the District Court) as long ago as 11 February 2019.� The respondent to the appeal is D (hereafter 'the mother').�
                  The delay that has attended this matter is regrettable in circumstances where, as pointed out by the Court of Appeal, Art 23(11) of the 2007 Hague Convention requires a competent authority taking any decision on recognition and enforcement, including any appeal, to act expeditiously in circumstances where the underlying obligation comprises or includes maintenance intended to meet current needs.
              Given the complexities of this case, I reserved judgment and now set out my reasons for reaching the decision I have.
              In the context of extensive litigation between the parties on both sides of the Atlantic, it is necessary to set out the procedural history of this matter in some detail.
              The parents married in New Mexico in September 2012.� The mother is a United States Citizen.� The father is a British Citizen and holds a US 'Green Card'.� Y was born in April 2013 in Manchester and holds dual British and US citizenship.� The parties' marriage broke down during the course of 2015 and they separated on 10 July 2015.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.