Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 9 • Freedom of religion • Administrative penalty imposed on a Jehovah's Witness for discussing the Bible with a third person in the latter's home • Lack of clear and foreseeable legal basis • Interference not "in accordance with the law"
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer , President , Tim Eicke, Faris Vehabović, Armen Harutyunyan, Anja Seibert-Fohr, Ana Maria Guerra Martins, Sebastian Răduleţu , judges , and Ilse Freiwirth, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 43082/14 ) against the Republic of Armenia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by an Armenian national, Ms Marina Hamzayan ("the applicant"), on 10 June 2014;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.