Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Pauliine Koskelo , President , ��������� Lorraine Schembri Orland, ��������� Davor Derenčinović , judges , and Dorothee von Arnim, Deputy Section Registrar,
the application (no. 6959/17) against the Republic of Croatia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) on 17 January 2017 by a Croatian national, Mr Aleksandar Cetinja, born in 1988 and living in Rijeka (�the applicant�), who was represented by Mr E. Bradamante, a lawyer practising in Rijeka;
the decision to give notice of the complaints concerning property, fairness of the proceedings and the principle of nullum crimen sine lege to the Croatian Government (�the Government�), represented by their Agent, Ms �. Sta�nik, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the application;
1.  The case concerns the applicant�s conviction for a minor offence which had become time-barred.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.