Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
MR. ZIMRAN SAMUEL (instructed by Legal Services) appeared on behalf of the Applicant.
MR. GARFIELD BRAITHWAITE (of Counsel) appeared on behalf of the First Respondent.
MR. IAN BUGG (instructed by Hodge Jones & Allen) appeared on behalf of the Guardian.
This is the end of care proceedings where the risk of harm to the two girls involved, one aged thirteen and one aged five, centres upon female genital mutilation.
The one narrow area of disagreement concerns future medical examinations which it is proposed should be carried out upon the girls. The purpose of this is as a deterrent so that the parents will know that were they to cause the children to undergo FGM in future then that would come to the attention of the authorities.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.