Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
COSTS RULING of Mr. Justice Mark Heslin delivered on the 24 th day of November 2022
    This ruling on the question of costs should be read in conjunction with the judgment delivered in this matter on 4th November 2022 (neutral citation [2022] IEHC 629 ) (�the judgment�), para. 126 of which stated, inter alia, the following:
    For the reasons set out in the judgment Start Mortgages Designated Activity Company (�Start�) was entirely successful and Ms. O�Mahony (�the defendant�) was entirely unsuccessful (in what were 7 separate applications, all of which related to Start�s application for possession of certain property owned by the defendant, the subject of a mortgage and charge of which Start is the registered owner). The significance of the foregoing is clear when one looks at Section 169(1) of the Legal Services Regulation Act of 2015 Act (�the 2015 Act�), which states:
�A party who is entirely successful in civil proceedings is entitled to an award of costs against a party who is not successful in those proceedings, unless the court orders otherwise, having regard to the particular nature and circumstances of the case, and the conduct of the proceedings by the parties, including�
(b)   whether it was reasonable for a party to raise, pursue or contest one or more issues in the proceedings,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.