Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 6 � 1 (civil) • Dismissal of constitutional complaint due to unforeseeable application of new four-month time-limit introduced after lodging of complaint, depriving applicant of right of access to a court • Constitutional Court�s interpretation of procedural limitations not in compliance with legal certainty principle • Absence of clear legislation and judicial practice concerning starting point for calculation of new time-limit • Disproportionate burden on applicant
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
Pere Pastor Vilanova , President , ���� Georgios A. Serghides, ���� Jolien Schukking, ���� Darian Pavli, ���� Peeter Roosma, ���� Ioannis Ktistakis, ���� Andreas Z�nd , judges , and Milan Bla�ko, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 73274/17) against the Republic of Albania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by an Albanian national, Mr P�llumb �ela (�the applicant�), on 9 October 2017;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.