Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
( Appeal - Civil service - Interinstitutional transfer - Transfer application on the basis of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, submitted in response to a vacancy notice - Rejection of that application - Obligation to take account of the order of priority laid down in Article 29(1) of those regulations - Errors of law - Contradictory reasoning )
APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 8 June 2023,
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by E. Lekan and A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agents,
composed of M.L. Arastey Sahún (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, D. Gratsias, E. Regan, J. Passer and B. Smulders, Judges,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 30 January 2025,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.