Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
1.������ By notice of motion of 4th February 2021 in the first of the above-entitled proceedings, Mr A seeks, inter alia, the following reliefs:
�1.���� An Order, whether pursuant to Order 31, Rule 29 of the Rules of the Superior Courts or otherwise, directing the Commissioner of An Garda S�och�na, his servants or agents, to make discovery on oath of all documents within his power, possession and/or procurement, within such time as may be fixed by Order of this Honourable Court, that falls within the following category of documents:-
�������� All documents relating to and/or evidencing recordings of the Applicant in these proceedings (including but not limited to audio and video recordings, and to include the recordings themselves), which were created on, are being stored on and/or have been obtained from, any electronic device or devices which An Garda S�och�na lawfully seized from the Respondent herein and which concern, relate to and/or are in connection with a criminal investigation of the said Applicant,
�������� to make provision for the Applicant his servants or agents for the inspection and/or searching of facilities of the said electronic device or devices using such information and communications technology system which is either owned or operated by or on behalf of the Commissioner of An Garda S�och�na, or as may be agreed between the parties.�
2.������ In her notice of motion, Ms B seeks , inter alia , the following reliefs:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.