Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
MS. PAT TREACY (SITTING AS A JUDGE OF THE CHANCERY DIVISION) ____________________
ANDREW WAUGH QC and JAANI RIORDAN (instructed by Simmons & Simmons LLP) appeared for the Claimant. MICHAEL TAPPIN QC and JAMES WHYTE (instructed by WilmerHale) appeared for the Defendant. ____________________
(a) the proportion of Roche's costs (excluding those in (c) and (d) below) which Insulet should be ordered to pay;
(c) summary assessment of Roche's costs of the stay application (there is already an order awarding Roche those costs); and
(d) summary assessment of 50% of Insulet's costs of Roche's application to amend its Defence (there is already an order awarding Insulet those costs).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.