Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 1 P1 • Secure the payment of taxes and of contributions or penalties • Lawful and proportionate sanctions imposed by tax authority on applicant company for failing to issue receipts for merchandise sold • Offence committed represented a part of a recurring domestic problem preventing proper functioning of the economy • Access and recourse to judicial review proceedings • No indication of unfairness or arbitrariness in decision-making process confirming imposition of sanctions • Fair balance struck between competing interests • No excessive burden
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Yonko Grozev, President , ��������� Tim Eicke, ��������� Faris Vehabović, ��������� Iulia Antoanella Motoc, ��������� Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, ��������� Pere Pastor Vilanova, ��������� Jolien Schukking , judges , and Ilse Freiwirth, Deputy Section Registrar,
the application (no. 15553/15) against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Romanian company, S.C. Zorina International S.R.L. (�the applicant company�), on 23 March 2015;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.