Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
              The appellant, hereinafter "the Secretary of State", appeals a decision of the First-tier Tribunal allowing the appeal of the respondents, hereinafter "the claimants", against a decision of the Secretary of State by an Entry Clearance Officer refusing their applications for an EU Settlement Scheme family permit.
              It is important to consider exactly what the First-tier Tribunal did.
              The applications were refused by the Secretary of State on 26 June 2020 because the claimants had applied for an EU Settlement Scheme family permit but they are not family members within the definition in Appendix EU (Family Permit) and so none of the applications could succeed. The claimants do not contend that the are "family members" for the purposes of Appendix EU.
              The claimants were informed of their right to appeal to the First-tier Tribunal in a standard notice saying that they:
"can appeal on the basis that the decision is not in accordance with the EUSS Family Permit rules, or that it breaches any rights you have under the Withdrawal Agreement, the EEA EFTA Separation Agreement, or the Swiss Citizens' Rights Agreement."
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.