Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Ms Tina Cook QC, appeared on behalf of the Applicant Ms Carla Flexman appeared on behalf of S Ms Kathryn Skellorn QC, and Mr Zahid Hussain appeared on behalf of A Mr William Higginson appeared on behalf of the guardian The Second and Fourth Respondents were not present nor represented ____________________
Transcribed from the official tape recording by MENDIP MEDIA GROUP Rockeagle House, Pynes Hill, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5AZ Telephone: 01392 213958 Fax: 01392 215643 Email: [email protected]
As explained by Ms Cook in her skeleton argument for the hearing before me on 9 th March, the local authority does not rely on the caution per se, but rather on the admissions which the local authority says underpin that caution.
I also bear in mind the observations of Mostyn J in Lancashire County Council v R [2013] EWHC 364 (Fam):
I stress that I had these points in the forefront of my mind throughout this hearing.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.