Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             As explained in the principal judgment, the determination of the Tenancy Tribunal under appeal is vitiated by an error of law, namely, the failure to provide a proper statement of reasons and findings.� This error of law is one which is amenable to the statutory appeal on a point of law provided for under section 123 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2004 (" RTA 2004 ").� It follows, therefore, that this aspect of the determination order of 10 January 2024 must be set aside on appeal.
             The statutory appeal to the High Court is provided for under section 123 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2004 as follows:
"(3)������� Any of the parties concerned may appeal to the High Court, within the relevant period, from a determination of the Tribunal (as embodied in a determination order) on a point of law.
(4)������� The determination of the High Court on such an appeal shall be final and conclusive.
             In determining whether there is an (implicit) power under the RTA 2004 to remit the matter to the Tenancy Tribunal, it is salutary to recall the limited role of the High Court on an appeal on a point of law.� The case law describing the High Court's jurisdiction on an appeal on a point of law has already been discussed in detail in the principal judgment (at paragraphs 7 to 11).�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.