Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 11 read in the light of Art 10 • Domestic courts� failure to adduce sufficient reasons to justify proportionality of custodial sentence imposed on activist following arrest at a peaceful demonstration and conviction for administrative offences
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Georges Ravarani , President , ��������� Mārtiņ� Mits, ��������� St�phanie Mourou-Vikstr�m, ��������� Lado Chanturia, ��������� Mar�a El�segui, ��������� Kateřina �im�čkov�, ��������� Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges , and Victor Soloveytchik, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 31349/20) against Georgia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Georgian national, Mr Lasha Chkhartishvili (�the applicant�), on 19 June 2020;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.