Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European markets in tin stabilisers and in ESBO/esters heat stabilisers – Decision establishing an infringement of Article 81 EC – Decision amending the initial decision annulled – Decision rejecting a request for repayment of the fine – Action for annulment – Actionable measure – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 266(1) TFEU)
GEA Group AG, established in Düsseldorf (Germany), represented by I. du Mont, R. van der Hout and C. Wagner, lawyers,
European Commission, represented by P. Rossi, V. Bottka and T. Baumé, acting as Agents,
APPLICATION pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision Ares(2019) 283284 final of 24 January 2019 dismissing the request of the applicant seeking repayment of the fine paid under Commission Decision C(2009) 8682 final of 11 November 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.589 – Heat stabilisers),
composed of M.J. Costeira, President, M. Kancheva and T. Perišin (Rapporteur), Judges,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.