Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
By order of this Court (O'Higgins J.) on 5 th February, 2001, the applicant was given leave to institute these proceedings for judicial review for the relief of
The grounds upon which the applicant was given leave are stated to be as follows:
Charges no. 37 to 60 inclusive allege that the applicant indecently assaulted M.D., a sister of the said B.H. on the dates therein referred to. The earlier offence insofar as the said M.D. is concerned alleges that the applicant assaulted her on a date unknown between 1 st January, 1958 and 31 st March, 1958. The most recent charge insofar as the said M.D. is concerned alleges that the applicant indecently assaulted her between 1 st October, 1963 and 31 st December, 1963. All of the said offences are alleged to have occurred in the County of Clare.
Charge no. 61 is a single charge which alleges that the applicant indecently assaulted I.G., first cousin of the said M.D. and B.H., between 1 st January, 1962 and 31 st December, 1962 when the said I.G. was about ten years of age.
With regard to the complainant M.D., she complains that the applicant sexually abused her when she was about nine years of age until she was about thirteen years of age.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.