Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
th to 7 th september 2021, 9 th to 13 th september 2021, and 16 th september 2021
Ms King, Legal Executive, for the Second & Fourth Respondents B & C acting through their Children�s Guardian
This is the final hearing of the Local Authority's applications for Care Orders in relation to A, B and C. �A is aged 15 years old, B is 14 and C is 12. M is their mother. �Their apparent father (who does not have parental responsibility) has not been located despite extensive efforts to locate him. �B, whose views differ from those of the Guardian, became separately represented after the last pre-trial review in August this year.
Fortunately, the trial advocates (who had not hitherto all been involved in the earlier hearings) attended the pre-trial review and, by dint of extending the time available for the final hearing from 4 to 7 days and allowing some time for discussions on day 1, it became possible to preserve the final hearing.
The Local Authority seeks final Care Orders for each child, with care plans for all of them to remain in their current foster care placement, and for contact to take place between the children and M once every two months (6 times per year). �That contact would be supervised, in the community, for 2 hours each time. �The Local Authority is also keen to promote indirect contact between the children and their maternal grandparents but would need their contact details from M to set this up.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.