Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
       The appellants appeal, with permission, against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal dismissing their appeals against the respondent's refusal to issue them with an EEA Family Permit under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 ("EEA Regulations").
       The appellants appealed against that decision. They elected not to have an oral hearing of their appeal and the appeals were therefore considered on the papers by the First-tier Tribunal.
       The appellants sought permission to appeal Judge Beg's decision on the grounds that she had incorrectly applied the test for dependency set out in Reyes v Secretary of State for the Home Department (EEA Regs: dependency) [2013] UKUT 314 and had erred by speculating on what other assistance she might be receiving .
       Permission to appeal was refused in the First-tier Tribunal, but was granted on a renewed application in the Upper Tribunal on the grounds that it was arguable that the judge erred in its application of the correct test as to dependency "by seeking reasons why the appellant could not be supported by others".
       The matter came before me for a hearing. The sponsor appeared before me for the appellants and Mr Tan appeared for the respondent. The sponsor was assisted by an interpreter in the Urdu language. I heard submissions from both parties.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.