Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Appeal – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for methacrylates – Duration of the infringement – Presumption of innocence – Statement of reasons – Unlimited jurisdiction – General principles of the protection of legitimate expectations and equal treatment – Proportionality of the fine)
APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 9 February 2012,
European Commission, represented by N. Khan and V. Bottka, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg,
composed of G. Arestis, President of the Chamber, A. Arabadjiev and J.L. da Cruz Vilaça (Rapporteur), Judges,
having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.