Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) funding – Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 – Support for rural development – Article 29(3) – Organic farming – Financial support for organic in-conversion production – Concepts of ‘initial period’ and ‘conversion period’ – Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 – Organic beekeeping – Minimum conversion period – Article 38(3) – Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 – Article 17 – Conversion)
REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Supreme Administrative Court, Bulgaria), made by decision of 27 April 2022, received at the Court on 17 May 2022, in the proceedings
composed of Z. Csehi (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, M. Ilešič and D. Gratsias, Judges,
– the Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond ‘Zemedelie’, by I.B. Zareva,
having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.