Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
            On 5 th October, 2017, the board granted permission for the demolition of a public house on a site on the Old Navan Road, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15 and for the construction of apartments.� The notice party acquired the land on 27 th July, 2018.�
            On 6 th January, 2020, the board granted a second permission for the demolition of the public house and the construction of co-living bedspaces. �The applicant brought a first set of judicial review proceedings [2020 No. 175 JR] challenging the validity of the second permission on 2 nd March, 2020. �On 20 th June, 2020, the board conceded those proceedings and on 25 th June, 2020, an order was made on consent quashing the second permission without remittal.�
            On 3 rd December, 2020, the board granted a third permission for demolition of the public house and construction of co-living spaces. �The applicant then brought the present proceedings challenging that permission on 1 st February, 2021.�
            On 27 th January, 2022, the board filed a statement of opposition.� The notice party developer did likewise on 24 th February, 2022.�
            On 26 th May, 2022, an RT� Prime Time programme broadcast further information about perceived bias and conflict of interest at the board.� An article was published on the RT� website the following day outlining some of this information.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.