Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The illustrative land use plan that had accompanied the application in its revised (January 1996) form showed River Way retained, and to the north and south of it, 78.4 acres for leisure/employment uses, including a theme park. The RMC site was within this area, and while the ACE site itself, and other frontage development on the south side of River Way, appears to have been excluded it was abutted by the area. Residential uses were shown along the river frontage to the south of River Way and covering much of the area between a new road (what is now John Harrison Way) and Horn Lane.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.