Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Nicholas Power appeared on behalf of A and B Mr Charles Prest appeared on behalf of Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council The mother was served but was not present or represented Miss Caroline Ford appeared on behalf of the genetic father Mr Andrew Wynne, generously acting pro bono, appeared on behalf of the aunt Miss Dawn Tighe, generously acting pro bono, appeared on behalf of Miss D Miss Alison Hunt appeared on behalf of the child's guardian Hearing dates: 17 � 21 November 2014, sitting at Sheffield ____________________
(The above letters are merely alphabetical from A � G and are not actual initials of any of the persons concerned.)
The court directs that no report of, or reference to, this case in the press, media or elsewhere, including any form of electronic or telephonic or broadcast communication, may name or otherwise identify any of the above persons or their addresses or (save to the extent described in this judgment) whereabouts. (Persons who are specifically named in this judgment may be named.)
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.